Go back to home

Weber Sidedraught 45's vs downdraught IDF 44's

Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
SaggaRS
Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 231
  • Scores: 5
  • Reward points: 2969
  • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
  • Location: Adelaide SA
  • Status: offline
2015/08/29 22:10:22 (permalink)
0

Weber Sidedraught 45's vs downdraught IDF 44's

I would be interested in what people's opinion is on the better application for warm Pinto..
Twin down or twin side?
I know the IDF 44's were standard equipment on European RS 2000's, but I've only ever had experience with twin sidedraught 45mm Dellortos.
 
I am considering either even IDF 48's.

CheeRS Shaul,

1980 MKII RS2000
http://www.classic-ford.org/cfp/tm.aspx?m=16455
#1


1 Reply Related Threads
    NQRS
    Deity
    • Total Posts : 897
    • Scores: 58
    • Reward points: 6931
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Townsville QLD Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Weber Sidedraught 45's vs downdraught IDF 44's 2015/08/30 12:42:59 (permalink)
    0
     
    IDF's are better for space if your engine bay is a bit cluttered but work just as well as sidedraughts ,though they are not as common as DCOE's and may be harder to source.   If you're thinking 48's you will need something a bit more than warm spec  for your pinto, the engine will be over fuelled. Len
    #2
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Trial Version 5.1