Re:Webers vs Dellorto's
2012/07/06 15:30:08
(permalink)
I used the dellortos (40DHLA's) on my original engine build after doing a lot of research about them and webers and yes they are supposed to be slightly better flowing with slightly better fuel atomisation, down low response etc etc. HOWEVER parts for them were/are nowhere near as easy to get as webers and most dyno shops even 10 years ago did not stock Delorto jets emulsions etc, so when I upgraded I went for weber 45DCOE13s. Weber parts are easier to come by and tuning them is more widely known than the Dellortos (Even in this day and age of fool injection!). BUT once the carbies are tooned (properly) then they work very well. I now have the autocross Pinto engine with the same 40DHLAs that were tuned properly for the cam by Datrally (shows how long ago they were set up) and they are the 5 "shotgun" progressions that are more difficult to tune.
That said I sought out 45DCOE13's specifically when upping the cam and breathing on the race engine having "learnt" from my Dellorto experience and reccomendations from real people and the ones dyno tuning the car. This engine is in a higher state of tune so cannot compare older DHLA carby characteristics, butt getting the "right" emulsions, jets and aux venturis to initially set them up was quite easy for Webers..... I have been building up another engine with 45DCOE152s, so my vote is then 2:1 in favour of Webers - mostly due to ease of getting the right/replacement parts for them - But once setup, I not sure there would be much to choose between as unless you are constantly changing cams and other parts, you should not need different part for the carbs after being properly setup.
Just my 2.2c worth including GST....