Go back to home

TCAs....rose joint vs bush

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
Author
MK1_Oz
Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 466
  • Scores: 9
  • Reward points: 4285
  • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
  • Location: South Australia
  • Status: offline
2010/12/01 17:16:42 (permalink)
0

TCAs....rose joint vs bush

Can the informed tell me why somebody would choose an adjustable TCA with a rose joint rather than one with the usual bush??? Is it that the rose joint is more predictable and provides better feel???
#1


22 Replies Related Threads

    esc-078
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 152
    • Scores: 5
    • Reward points: 2868
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/12/01 17:24:16 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    The only negative thing about rose jointed TCA's is that they're illegal on public roads. Other than that, rose's for me please. [:x)]
    #2
    MK1_Oz
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 466
    • Scores: 9
    • Reward points: 4285
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: South Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/12/01 19:05:38 (permalink)
    0
    but why???????????????

    Burton's do rose jointed ones cheaper than bushed!!?

    Do roses have a shorter life span also?
    #3

    Inferno115
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 208
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 957
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Reynella, Adelaide South Australia Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/13 18:43:56 (permalink)
    0
    rose joints are suitable for track use as its rare you will race in rain, if the vehicle is a street car unless the rose joints have the rubber boots(and sometimes even if they do) they will be ruined from the rain and dirt
    #4
    MK1_Oz
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 466
    • Scores: 9
    • Reward points: 4285
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: South Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/15 21:52:52 (permalink)
    0
    is that really right Inferno???? You cannot use rose joints in the rain!!!!!!!!??
    #5
    Inferno115
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 208
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 957
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Reynella, Adelaide South Australia Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 14:47:09 (permalink)
    0
    well you can but they will get ruined very quickly, the dustboots can prolong their life for road use, but only good brands like cusco come with this, and i doubt they list a escort tca
    #6

    Mickas
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 624
    • Scores: -38
    • Reward points: 757
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 14:55:13 (permalink)
    0
    What are your thoughts DannyM?
    #7
    Diablo69
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 165
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1838
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Glenelg SA Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 18:42:59 (permalink)
    0
    I have the adjustable bush type. Basically same as standard TCA but adjustable. My choice was that in SA Rose joint was illegal for road use.
    #8
    MK1_Oz
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 466
    • Scores: 9
    • Reward points: 4285
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: South Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 18:54:42 (permalink)
    0
    Mine will be a dedicated tarmac car so I can get around the road rules on that one. just need somebody to confirm or disagree that wet ruins rose joints.

    Also nobody has actually stated the benefit (other than bling) of rose over bush...........
    #9
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 19:32:30 (permalink)
    0
    Hi Mk1_Oz,

    Water wont hurt a rose joint, its the dust and dirt that usually comes with the water that is the problem. In saying that, I ran open rose jointed arms in the front of my car on the road and track for 10 years and the rose joints are still ok. Bear in mind there are several different levels of quality available in rose joints, the quality is usually indicated by the lb load rating.

    The benefit is increased feedback from the road/car and a very positive location of the component that it is mounting.

    The disadvantages are a more harsh ride and more body shell wear an tear due to the harsh ride and increased feedback or shock transfer.

    Cheers,

    Phil.
    #10
    MK1_Oz
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 466
    • Scores: 9
    • Reward points: 4285
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: South Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 20:09:03 (permalink)
    0
    Cheers Phil. Might go rose jointed and perhaps find some of those lil rubber booties to put on them....just have to decide who to buy them from......so many choices but all seem to be pommie
    #11
    jpayne
    Scholar
    • Total Posts : 360
    • Scores: 19
    • Reward points: 2898
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Melbourne
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 22:41:39 (permalink)
    0
    A 10 dollar rose joint will not come with dust and grime seals, will have softer materials, lower load ratings and wear quicker than a 100 dollar joint which may have inbuilt protection. Either way a dust boot is cheap insurance. You get what you pay for!
    As phil pointed out, positive location harsh vibration which leads to increases component fatigue, In my opinion better for an all out circuit car. For a road rally car I think I would prefer the more forgiving bushed version, to give some compliance over rutts, cutting corners and gutters!

    JP
    #12
    MK1_Oz
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 466
    • Scores: 9
    • Reward points: 4285
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: South Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/16 22:44:54 (permalink)
    0
    good point jp
    #13
    Smcka
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 346
    • Scores: 7
    • Reward points: 2348
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/17 07:10:36 (permalink)
    0
    I have dust boots....
    #14
    danny m
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 127
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 4400
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Brisbane Qld Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: TCAs....rose joint vs bush 2010/01/17 19:56:03 (permalink)
    0
    quote:
    Originally posted by Mickas

    What are your thoughts DannyM?



    The first question needs to be asked what class do you intend to run in and are they legal for that class as they are out for Imp/Prod and alot of other classes except sports sedans. The other question is why do you need them as there are lots of ways to get camber as I've run as high as 8 degrees of negative without them as it can be done. But that said if the rules for my class allowed me to I'd be running them as it does provide a much more positive location and there would be a definite benefit. But it must be said a lot of the TCA's out there are basically junk as they start with a cheap qulaity TCA and cut the end off and weld a threaded plug in and then screw a cheap and nasty spherical joint in which will then intern put more load on the poor quality ball joint on the outer end.
    If you want them to last you will need to be using a decent quality joint preferably a 1/2" chrom-moly and it alone will cost you at least $100 or more before you screw it into you're new modified TCA. Most of the arms you see out there that are around the $200 mark will have both a a cheap TCA and joint so don't expect them to last as they wil start rattling before they ever would have with a bush. If you want somethng that will last you need something that is made from a genuine Ford arm with a decent teflon lined chro-moly joint and it should last without a boot as the teflon liner will keep most of the moisture and grit away from the contact area of the joint. You will see this in the better qulaity arms from Gartrac, WWRS, Historic Rallysport etc.
    As I said havea read of the rules because it will either say the they can be modified with spherical joints which means you have to modify a standard TCA, if it says TCA's are "Free" which some classes have get an TCA fabricated wit ha spherical joint at both ends which in the long run will be the most economical

    Danny
    #15
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Trial Version 5.1