Go back to home

Coolant flowspeed

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
Author
muzza
Enthusiast
  • Total Posts : 246
  • Scores: 0
  • Reward points: 1181
  • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
  • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
  • Status: offline
2011/02/20 11:52:48 (permalink)
0

Coolant flowspeed

I've been told now by every Radiator shop to be careful not to cycle coolant too fast through the radiator as the coolant won't have time to cool down. This doesn't sit well with me as I can't understand why moving coolant faster would have a negative effect, I am standing firm on this as I think it doesn't make a differnce how fast coolant flows obviously high revving engines will require hi-flo rates but why can't the flow be say 150L per minute all the time.

P.S. I thought this would be a good healthy debate topic.
#1


21 Replies Related Threads

    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 12:43:08 (permalink)
    0
    Hi Muzza,

    Dont fall into that trap...

    Faster is definately not better,same for to slow...there is a happy medium, it is all relevant to the time in which it takes for heat to displace from the coolant to the radiator tubes and fins and then from the tubes and fins to the air travelling through them. In a conventional cooling system, the thermostat provides the restriction to flow when coolant is cold by closing, but when fully open it is still providing a restriction to flow due to the cross sectional area of its opening. The only time where more is better is when you are talking cfm of air movement through the radiator.

    If you have ever had a car where the thermostat was removed...you will probably have noticed how long it took to warm up on the guage...what was really happening was the bores and combustion chambers were wickedly hot because the coolant was travelling to fast through the block to be as effective as it is capable of being when travelling at a slower pace.

    To solve your cooling issues the answer is in the cross sectional and cubic area of the radiator(and its efficiency) and the airflow through the radiator...As long as the pump and thermostat are in good working order[;^)]

    One of the guys who first fitted the FJ to your car ran an FJ20DET in a 120Y successfully for many years without cooling issues...the engine had the std water pump and thermostat.

    Cheers,

    Phil.
    #2
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 12:58:35 (permalink)
    0
    Just looking at your engine bay shots...I cant tell how high the top of the radiator is compared to the head, if the radiator is to low with a fill point on the radiator, you might be getting cavitation in the head. A similar story to the RB30 in the Skyline and Commodore...Commodores cracked heads and had overheating issues, Skylines didn't...it was all relevant to the radiator position in relation to the head...Skylines were easy to bleed the cooling system and would self bleed, Commodore's weren't and wouldn't. The answerfor your car if this is the case would be a header tank or a fill point on the high side of the head
    #3

    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 13:04:19 (permalink)
    0
    Like this

    #4
    muzza
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 246
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1181
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 13:33:36 (permalink)
    0
    Thanks for the reply Phil! I was thinking about this one night and it kept me awake for ages, Let me throw another angle at you.

    Engine - Creates Thermal energy
    Radiator - Dissipates Thermal energy

    Above we have a balanced equation

    In creating good thermal heat dissipation is to get the radiator as hot as possible (closest to engine temp) then flow maximum ambient air through it thus creating the highest heat transfer. (Radiator temp - Ambient temp = differential temp) The higher the differential temp the better cooling of cousre suface area plays a big part too. Now I can't see why flowing coolant at high speed would lower the radiator temp BECAUSE once coolant leaves the block it is already starting to cool.
    #5
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 13:40:12 (permalink)
    0
    If the coolant moves to fast through the radiator, the majority of heat will stay in the coolant and travel back into the engine. The radiator and coolant need to be able to perform their heat transfer as in the 'cold engine no thermostat' example. If the coolant travels to fast, you will have the same effect but at the opposite end of the process, the heat exchange(coolant to radiator) part of the process cant occur effectively and the heat is retained in the coolant and therefore in the cooling system.
    #6

    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 13:43:40 (permalink)
    0
    quote:
    Originally posted by muzza



    Engine - Creates Thermal energy
    Radiator - Dissipates Thermal energy

    Above we have a balanced equation




    It is only balanced if both are equally efficient
    #7
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 13:50:46 (permalink)
    0
    quote:
    Originally posted by muzza



    In creating good thermal heat dissipation is to get the radiator as hot as possible (closest to engine temp) then flow maximum ambient air through it thus creating the highest heat transfer. (Radiator temp - Ambient temp = differential temp) The higher the differential temp the better cooling of cousre suface area plays a big part too.




    Agree'd...this is why aircon systems run higher pressures on a hot day, in order to create a temp/pressure differential. Your cooling system operating pressure also comes into it
    #8
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 14:07:41 (permalink)
    0
    All of the above is only relevant if the heat transfer can occur...which will only occur efficiently if the coolant flow is travelling at the correct speed...to fast is as bad as to slow. To fast and the heat tranfer between the coolant and the radiator structure is hindered, to slow and the transfer between the radiator structure and the atmosphere cant keep up. Its a no win situation for to fast or to slow...it needs to be just right.

    The 'just right' speed of flow will be very hard to identify and will change as the ambient temps change. The Davies Craig electric pump is most effective at maintaining the correct flow as it is monitoring the heat stored in the coolant.

    A good example of to much flow being bad is what happens if a factory waterpump is spun to fast...I had a Sigma years ago with a modified 2.6L and it kept blowing up heater cores...the fix was to fit a larger water pump pulley to slow the pump down...Danny's N/A YB is also a good example of this...the revs it see's demand's a larger waterpump pulley to slow down the water pump
    #9
    muzza
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 246
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1181
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 15:06:14 (permalink)
    0
    ok I believe that cavitation occurs when the impeller spins at high speeds and creates occsilations rendering the impeller inefficient.

    But consider this, remove cavitation from the equation, What you are saying is that it takes time for the coolant to radiate heat into the rad core. But if this takes time then the theory of the faster the coolant flows thru the core the cooler the radiator will get cause the coolant won't have time to transfer heat, but imagine coolant flowing say 50000 litres per minute this would mean the radiator would stay the cool cause heat transfer would be way inefficent, but I say the core would = the source temp.

    #10
    Mickas
    Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 624
    • Scores: -38
    • Reward points: 757
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 16:18:08 (permalink)
    0
    quote:
    Originally posted by Phil

    All of the above is only relevant if the heat transfer can occur...which will only occur efficiently if the coolant flow is travelling at the correct speed...to fast is as bad as to slow. To fast and the heat tranfer between the coolant and the radiator structure is hindered, to slow and the transfer between the radiator structure and the atmosphere cant keep up. Its a no win situation for to fast or to slow...it needs to be just right.

    The 'just right' speed of flow will be very hard to identify and will change as the ambient temps change. The Davies Craig electric pump is most effective at maintaining the correct flow as it is monitoring the heat stored in the coolant.

    A good example of to much flow being bad is what happens if a factory waterpump is spun to fast...I had a Sigma years ago with a modified 2.6L and it kept blowing up heater cores...the fix was to fit a larger water pump pulley to slow the pump down...Danny's N/A YB is also a good example of this...the revs it see's demand's a larger waterpump pulley to slow down the water pump



    I am with him
    #11
    Wagin
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 16
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1223
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Vic Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 18:21:54 (permalink)
    0

    Haha - I do like a good technical debate!

    I did a lot of work on engine cooling systems in 2008 as part of my final year engineering project and really enjoy this subject so my thoughts are as follows:

    From the graph I have attached you can see that at normal atmospheric pressure, ~101 KPa or just under 15 psi, water will boil at 100 deg C. If the pressure is increased, the temperature at which it boils increases. Whilst if the pressure decreases, the boiling temperature also decreases.



    Cavitation occurs when the pressure of a liquid drops enough to cause it to boil at whatever temperature it is at. In engines, the motion of the pump impeller in the coolant creates both high and low pressure regions around it, in much the same way an object, such as a car, passing through air does. Cavitation will occur in the low pressure zones of the coolant if the temperature is high enough to cause it to boil. So, for example, if the pressure of the coolant at one point near the impeller is ~70 KPa, than the temperature at that point only needs to be ~90 deg C for cavitation to occur. Cavitation around the water pump will show as pitting on the pump housing and impeller.

    The reason race engines such as Danny's usually feature larger water pump pulleys when using otherwise standard water pumps is to reduce the impeller speed. Ford did not design the YB engine to run at 10,000 rpm or whatever Danny's does, so if the impeller speed was not reduced either the coolant pressure would be too great (possibly causing things like heater core failures as mentioned by Phil) and/or causing cavitation at the impeller due to it rotating at a speed higher than it was designed to.

    With regard to the location of the fill point, if the cooling system fill point is lower than any of the coolant passages in the engine the system may be difficult to bleed and the possibility of pockets of air being trapped at high points exists. Cavitation is not the correct term here, rather this can cause air locks in the system which hinder coolant flow, or the formation of pockets of steam at very high temperatures and pressures which can cause damage to the engine.

    Back to the flow rate question, I believe Phil is correct with regard to coolant flow speed. Heat transfer is not an instant process, and water takes a fair amount of time to heat up and cool down relative to the engine block and radiator. This means that if the coolant flow is too great then not only will it not be taking as much heat away from the engine as it potentially could, it will not be losing as much of its heat to the air passing through the radiator as it could. If coolant flow is too slow the engine will produce more heat than the coolant can carry away. Both would result in an over heating engine.

    So the ideal point is indeed somewhere in the middle...

    Sorry about the length there, I hope you find it useful.

    Regards,
    Wagin
    #12
    Mark
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 572
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 5173
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 18:39:55 (permalink)
    0
    Going straight back to thermodynamics, the larger delta T (difference in temperature) the higher the heat transfer rate. Easy, given the same system that is of course....

    The theory of not enough time to cool the water is not the issue at all because it is the overall heat exchange that matters...(J/s)

    I design cooling systems all the time, and we trade off flow and efficiency to get the best outcome for the given data...Yes if coolant flows slowly the water will exit the radiator at a lower temp but at a lower flow and lower energy loss per unit time due to the lowering delta T. The trick is the have the best efficiency.
    The thermostat is so important as it brings engine temps up quickly, regulates it AND it gives a coolant reservoir of cooler liquid (if ambient conitions allow)....Obviously when you race around there is no chance to build up the reservoir so you rely on high flow to keep the coolant circulating....I recommend the highest max flow combined with efficiency of the pump (cavitation will be detrimetnal to cooling capacity)...
    So if you can have "lower" efficient pump flow and still cool the engine, then this is a winning situation.....
    Ha - I was writing my response as you were wagin.....
    #13
    Phil
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 1786
    • Scores: 35
    • Reward points: 4581
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 20:43:58 (permalink)
    0
    So the ideal situation is as much flow as possible without the pump cavitating, but no more flow than can produce an efficient exchange of heat[%]
    #14
    muzza
    Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 246
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1181
    • Joined: 2011/08/01 11:02:49
    • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
    • Status: offline
    RE: Coolant flowspeed 2011/02/20 22:08:12 (permalink)
    0
    Some great food for thought!

    It does seem like in the real world flow rate combined with heat transfer rate has a trade off where the energy to drive the pump is more than the return in heat transfer therefore it would be useless running any faster. And also there is a cavitation threshold which should not be breached and would result in more harm than good.




    #15
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Trial Version 5.1