﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>&amp;#39;87 MR2 Understeer</title><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/tm.aspx?m=93671</link><description /><copyright>(c) MR2 AUSTRALIA</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (MCT_MR2)</title><description>I found the easiest way to battle understeer was to have the front ride height lower, raking the car to get more weight over the front end. I have standard swaybars, and used to have tokico illumina shocks and cusco springs 4k front and 6k rear. alignment was 2 toe out front .5 camber and 8 deg castor with a 20rca adjuster. rear was 1mm toe in total and 0 neg.</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/100504</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:58:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Doogs)</title><description>I have heard people's&amp;nbsp;criticism&amp;nbsp;of Kings before, but these turned up at a price I could not refuse. Coupled with the shocks the car currently has it has been a vast improvement over the original springs. My only complaint at the moment is the lack of rear roll stiffness due to not having a rear bar fitted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94067</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:00:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Mrskylighter)</title><description>I recently replaced&amp;nbsp;the Kings in my AW11 with APEX springs. Massive improvement and the car sits level now as well.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94060</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:13:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (wiso)</title><description>ohh you didn't. I am so sorry.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s8.gif" alt="" data-smiley="&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s8.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:'(]" /&gt;" /&gt; HAHA&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;King springs are absolutely horrible in these cars. each AW I have bought lately have all had 17" wheels and kings springs and the ride is absolutely atrocious. they bottom out, they bounce badly and the draft angle on the car is not right, kings make it sit lower in the rear in the 4AGE and the 4AZGE is alot worse due to the extra weight in the rear end. Plus they also aren't held captive when at full droop.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;But this is all personal opinion. I cannot seem to drive the car fast around corners with king springs fitted, I always found I would bottom out and smack guards. I could go faster around corners with even the stock springs fitted&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;I think general consensus seems to be good off the shelf ones are Eibach or RSR. I could not afford these I got some custom made stuff, alot of dicking around taking them in and out like 3 times getting them reset, but happy with the result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94059</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:44:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Doogs)</title><description>&lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;span class="original"&gt;wiso&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;sorry doogs probably should have mentioned that what I suggested is probably more for stiffer springs.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;I run on mine 1mm total out front, max castor, neg 1 per side. rear 3mm total toe in, neg 1.5 per side. its quite nice on the street. I have 2.3kg front springs and 4.6kg rear springs with 18mm swaybars both front and back.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;so to answer you question I run neg 1.5 on the rear instead of max because the body roll is not as severe with stiffer springs so the camber change on body roll is not as great.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;I found tyres wore very very evenly all around. front end grip was fine. more just lost it due to super**** spec front tyres.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;For track/weekend I would deffinitly up that front toe to 2mm total out and I wouldn't personally run more than neg 1.5 on my suspension setup. rear I would probably leave about 3mm in and would up the neg to 2/2.5 per side&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for the input, good food for thought.&lt;br/&gt;I fitted Kings all round to my car recently and it already had a set of 4-way adjustable shocks.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94056</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:06:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (wiso)</title><description>sorry doogs probably should have mentioned that what I suggested is probably more for stiffer springs.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;I run on mine 1mm total out front, max castor, neg 1 per side. rear 3mm total toe in, neg 1.5 per side. its quite nice on the street. I have 2.3kg front springs and 4.6kg rear springs with 18mm swaybars both front and back.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;so to answer you question I run neg 1.5 on the rear instead of max because the body roll is not as severe with stiffer springs so the camber change on body roll is not as great.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;I found tyres wore very very evenly all around. front end grip was fine. more just lost it due to super**** spec front tyres.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;For track/weekend I would deffinitly up that front toe to 2mm total out and I wouldn't personally run more than neg 1.5 on my suspension setup. rear I would probably leave about 3mm in and would up the neg to 2/2.5 per side&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94050</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:35:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (scz)</title><description>I have noticed a big difference with my '88 AW depending on how the shocks are adjusted.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94044</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:50:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Doogs)</title><description>&lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;span class="original"&gt;MonsieurDeux&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;aha! Fair enough then!&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look into the sw20 sway bars aswell :) Im just sorting some out now for mine&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I heard this was the case, I'm a little hesitant to make the car too taily though. It's already pretty snappy when the rear decides to come out! Definitely thinking an adjustable bar might be the go.&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;span class="original"&gt;wiso&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;for tyre life he doogs is close to the money for toeing. but camber for tyre life neg1 -&amp;gt;neg 1.5 front and neg1.5 for rear each side. you can usually go up to neg2.5 all around. maybe neg2 on the front some have saidi&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting to hear you'd consider running a fraction more rear camber than front, have you found front grip to be&amp;nbsp;compromised&amp;nbsp;as a result?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94039</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:42:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (wiso)</title><description>for tyre life he doogs is close to the money for toeing. but camber for tyre life neg1 -&amp;gt;neg 1.5 front and neg1.5 for rear each side. you can usually go up to neg2.5 all around. maybe neg2 on the front some have saidi</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94027</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:41:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (MonsieurDeux)</title><description>aha! Fair enough then!&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look into the sw20 sway bars aswell :) Im just sorting some out now for mine&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94026</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:30:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Doogs)</title><description>&lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;span class="original"&gt;MonsieurDeux&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are your tyres going to survive long with that!? lots of camber, toe in and out&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:)]" /&gt;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;im sure it will handle well though&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Probably not lol! The car is mainly for weekend motorsport, won't really be doing much street time.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94025</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (MonsieurDeux)</title><description>Are your tyres going to survive long with that!? lots of camber, toe in and out&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="&lt;img src="https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/upfiles/smiley/s1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:)]" /&gt;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;im sure it will handle well though&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94022</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:15:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Doogs)</title><description>Interesting read guys, I'm finding my car has similar tendencies. I know my tyres are crap and alignment is up the piss, something I'm looking at remedying soon. Considering 4mm total toe in on the rear, 2mm total toe out on the front, 5-6 degrees of caster and as much camber as they can get.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/94005</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:32:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (Whore of Babylon)</title><description>ill be retrieving the swaybars from the 93 SW20 wreck now :) easy upgrade for my 87 aus deliverd aw11&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/93678</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:20:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: '87 MR2 Understeer (MonsieurDeux)</title><description>Adrian - Tyres look ok, but like you say as soon as it comes to the nitty gritty the front loses out way sooner than the rear (exception being a steep uphill on greenhill road when wet) Ill check my alignment, and see if adjusting any camber helps around the corners, especially if I get an 18mm bar in the rear&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;Wiso - Ill have a look if any sw20's are being split and see if I can grab their sway bars, if not whiteline seems like a good route, ill put them in and then get the tyres aligned, and see how the understeer plays up and see if i need to bring in a little bit of camber to clear up the problem.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks guys&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/93677</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:20:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>