﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Revalve of Bilstein Shocks?</title><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/tm.aspx?m=84153</link><description /><copyright>(c) MR2 AUSTRALIA</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (stuka)</title><description> ok thanks, will see how it goes&lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84253</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:05:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (MRTurbo)</title><description> &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;span class="original"&gt;stuka&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Thanks for the replies. I thought the 92 cars were lower not higher than the earlier 90 cars? Mine runs particularly high and I assume they are stock but maybe not, the car was used as a tarmac rally car. Josh did you notice much of a drop with the Eibachs? I reckon you would need to go custom for the linear springs. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; Are you going to Wakefield in January? &lt;br&gt; &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt; No probs mate - the springs were already in there when i bought the car so I couldn't tell you about the drop sorry.&lt;br&gt; However, I don't know whether they sagged or what, but they were on average 5-10mm too low for REGENCY specifications here in SA. So I had to get them re-set/lengthened.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; Wont be able to make it in Jan unfortunately, just started a new job (no leave).&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84187</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:02:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (Reddtarga)</title><description> Ha ha sorry.&amp;nbsp; I got that wrong. I meant to say that '90 model springs are about 3/4' &lt;b&gt;HIGHER &lt;/b&gt;than the later 92+ ones. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt; I also found that with the Pro Kits the car was lowered a bit more on the rear than the front. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84177</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:10:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (stuka)</title><description> Thanks for the replies. I thought the 92 cars were lower not higher than the earlier 90 cars? Mine runs particularly high and I assume they are stock but maybe not, the car was used as a tarmac rally car. Josh did you notice much of a drop with the Eibachs? I reckon you would need to go custom for the linear springs.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; Are you going to Wakefield in January?&lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84176</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:03:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (MRTurbo)</title><description> hey Pat &lt;br&gt; I've got Eibach Pro Kits in mine and AFAIK the shocks (Koni) haven't been touched. Feels great over bumps at high speed too, totally stable and planted. &lt;br&gt; One complaint/observation though, I heard the Koni shocks have 'digressive' damping so the back end does feel a tad floaty with&amp;nbsp;progressive&amp;nbsp;springs such as Pro kits.&lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt; BTW: If anyone knows of off-the-shelf &lt;b&gt;Linear &lt;/b&gt;springs for the SW20 rear (NOT coilovers) please yell out...&lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84175</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:45:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (Reddtarga)</title><description> &lt;i&gt;"Eibach lowering springs (25mm lower)"&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt; If you are talking about Eibach Prokits, although they advertise one inch drop, you probably won't get anything like that.   &lt;br&gt; So if you have the stock Bilstein sealed strut/shocks they should be fine if there is no sign of oil around the tops. &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;   &lt;br&gt; On my car I found that Prokits ride only about 5mm lower than stock 92+ springs,  &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;  &lt;br&gt; Manufacturers advertised drop can be a bit dodgy because they often seem to compare their product to brand new '90 model springs that are about 3/4"&lt;strike&gt; lower&lt;/strike&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;higher&lt;/b&gt; than 92+ springs anyway.  &lt;br&gt; Also your old 20 YO springs have sagged as well.  &lt;br&gt; &amp;nbsp;   &lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84174</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:39:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Revalve of Bilstein Shocks? (stuka)</title><description> I have just ordered a set of Eibach lowering springs (25mm lower) for my SW20 on Bilstein shocks. How can I decide whether I need to revalve the shocks? My first instinct and after speaking to a mate at Goodyear is to just fit them and see how it drives before doing anything drastic, what do people reckon?&lt;br&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/84153</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:17:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>