﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart</title><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/tm.aspx?m=115360</link><description /><copyright>(c) MR2 AUSTRALIA</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re: Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart (turbomr2)</title><description>Hey Rob, does the Tial flutter at all, especially at low revs (low boost)?&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/115432</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:35:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart (Rob)</title><description>I&amp;#39;m a fan of the TIAL just had one fitted</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/115407</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 01:46:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart (turbomr2)</title><description>Thanks Carmikey.&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;...anybody have input regarding the Sard R2D2?&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/115406</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:30:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart (Carmikey)</title><description>I can only comment on 'TurboSmart'. Ive had plenty of them &amp;amp; different types (recycle &amp;amp; Vent to atmosphere), all have been great with no issues at all.&amp;nbsp; GFB are good also.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/115366</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:14:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sard R2D2 vs  Turbosmart (turbomr2)</title><description>Hey guys, I am trying to decide between these 2 BOV....has any anyone used or had any problems with either one?&lt;br/&gt;(To be used on a 3SGTE &amp;nbsp;build..expected power: 380-480 whp)&lt;br/&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>https://www.classic-ford.org/mr2/mr2play/FindPost/115360</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:11:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>