Twin Cam/ 1600GT, CK49??

2013/11/08 19:59:24

ratta tat tat

Hi all

I met a guy the other week who has a 1600GT shell, but he said it's not a CK49. Is this right?
Thanks

2013/11/08 20:33:13

evobda2

This one is apparently?
http://www.my105.com/listingdetails.aspx?id=4123

As is this..
http://oldholden.com/ebay-cars/mo.php?suction=130582273742

Im assuming they know the difference from standard besides the front guards and not just saying it?
Note also 1300GT shells wern't CK49...

2013/11/08 20:40:25

ratta tat tat

The links you provided are both for 1970 twin cams. In 1972 the twin cam was replaced with the "1600GT"

So were there any 1600GT's that weren't CK49? Thanks

2013/11/08 21:34:44

evobda2

Oh sorry mis read.
There was a thread on RS forum.. doesn't give the answer though.
http://rsmotorsport.com.a...pic.php?f=2&t=4769

2013/11/08 21:39:05

celtic

They were badged GT1600, not 1600GT.
There are quite a few differences between the 1970 models and the later 1972 models,mostly trim and chrome details.

2013/11/08 21:52:33

ratta tat tat

celtic
They were badged GT1600, not 1600GT.

Thanks for clearing that up, I was going by my copy of "ford escort downunder", must be a typo

celtic
There are quite a few differences between the 1970 models and the later 1972 models,mostly trim and chrome details.

And the shells?

2013/11/11 08:19:10

Gdub

All Twin cam shells in Australia were CK49

Twin Cam/ 1600GT, CK49??

Use My Existing Forum Account

Use My Social Media Account