Before the original starter shat itself I got a few cranks in and there was no
Spark. I then tried to bridge the positive side of the coil straight to the battery like what was suggested but without removing the existing ignition wire (because this wasn't suggested.) The starter promptly shat itself. Coincidence or what I dont know.
The problem is, during a normal non-cranking constant operation the Escort first has power running through an ignition wire from the key then through a ballast resistor then to a junction which both goes to the positive side of the coil or the starter.
As far as I can figure, the ignition key barrel has no power running through the ignition wire coming from it when it's cranking and starting. Power can then either run from the ignition key or the starter solenoid to that junction before it goes to the coil.
I'm assuming power then runs from the solenoid on the starter instead when it's cranking and starting. When it's started and the key is returned to ignition/run the power then runs from the ignition barrel through the ballast resistor to the coil.
Thing is, between the ignition barrel and the ressistor I have the alarm circuit.
So as you can see, when power is running through the solenoid during a cranking start power will go to the coil as it should but also return via the junction and backtrack temporarily through the resistor and then through the alarm circuit which I think stuffs things up.
Does this sound correct?
Is this the way the start sequence works on an Escort?
I can't test if there's spark during start at the moment Because the new HiTorque unit doesn't have an ignition plug on it like the original so i can test it. So I'm thinking I need to setup a relay operated by the starter wire that will deliver power both to the coil and starter at the same time.
Thing is I still think I need a reverse flow prevention. Sound right? [xo]